Technology strategy & priorities
Turn business goals into a small number of funded priorities, with the assumptions, dependencies, costs, and measures made explicit.
Fractional CTO & Technology Strategy
A fractional CTO should not be a senior engineer with a different title. The work is to help leadership decide what deserves attention and money, make the technical trade-offs clear, and stay close enough to delivery to know whether the plan is working.
Where I can help
The best fit is an organization with a real product, customers, or operating system—and a leadership team that needs a senior technical counterpart for choices that cut across product, engineering, finance, security, vendors, and AI.
Turn business goals into a small number of funded priorities, with the assumptions, dependencies, costs, and measures made explicit.
Review the current system, identify where complexity is creating cost or risk, and decide what should be built, bought, integrated, simplified, or retired.
Assess team capability, delivery practices, staffing, outsourced work, and vendor dependence. Clarify where the organization needs stronger internal capability.
Separate use cases where AI changes the economics from work better handled by conventional software or process improvement. Define how success will be measured before scaling.
Connect security and compliance choices to customer requirements, commercial risk, and the operating model rather than treating them as a separate technical checklist.
Give founders and senior leaders a clear recommendation: the options, the trade-offs, the decision, and what evidence should trigger a change of course.
A practical starting point
A short first engagement can establish the facts before anyone commits to a broader fractional relationship. The output should be useful even if the work ends there.
A concise review of the decisions currently consuming the most money, risk, or executive attention.
Architecture, spend, team capacity, vendors, security, product commitments, and major dependencies.
What to fund now, what to defer, what to stop, and where more evidence is needed.
A sequence of decisions and work that fits the organization’s actual capacity.
Operational and financial measures that show whether the plan produced the intended result.
Relevant operating experience
I have managed an approximately $1 million annual technology budget, teams of up to 10, multi-year technology plans, build-versus-buy decisions, market-entry analysis, platform modernization, production AI, cybersecurity programs, and cross-functional technology portfolios.
I am also pursuing senior full-time technology strategy and business transformation leadership roles. The common requirement is the same: meaningful involvement before priorities and budgets are fixed.